New pseudo test with -find : -sort_lba which is actually an option
This commit is contained in:
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
.\" First parameter, NAME, should be all caps
|
||||
.\" Second parameter, SECTION, should be 1-8, maybe w/ subsection
|
||||
.\" other parameters are allowed: see man(7), man(1)
|
||||
.TH XORRISO 1 "May 14, 2009"
|
||||
.TH XORRISO 1 "May 17, 2009"
|
||||
.\" Please adjust this date whenever revising the manpage.
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.\" Some roff macros, for reference:
|
||||
@ -1288,6 +1288,12 @@ is performed if the decision is "yes" or "true". See operator -if.
|
||||
\fB\-true\fR and \fB\-false\fR :
|
||||
Always match resp. match not. Evaluation goes on.
|
||||
.br
|
||||
\fB\-sort_lba\fR :
|
||||
Always match. This causes -find to perform its action in a sequence sorted by
|
||||
the ISO image block addresses of the files. It may improve throughput with
|
||||
actions which read data from optical drives. Action will always get the
|
||||
absolute path as parameter.
|
||||
.br
|
||||
Available operators are:
|
||||
.br
|
||||
\fB\-not\fR :
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user