From b4191b032832f003aafde42516418ab96d81ef32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:03:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Corrected a misunderstanding about meaning of code piece

---
 libisoburn/trunk/releng/inc/releng_getopts_ts.inc | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libisoburn/trunk/releng/inc/releng_getopts_ts.inc b/libisoburn/trunk/releng/inc/releng_getopts_ts.inc
index 312d8c07..6a1b6fdc 100644
--- a/libisoburn/trunk/releng/inc/releng_getopts_ts.inc
+++ b/libisoburn/trunk/releng/inc/releng_getopts_ts.inc
@@ -200,12 +200,9 @@ if [ x"$CLEANUP" != x"0" -a x"$CLEANUP" != x"1" ]; then
 fi
 
 
-# ts B10714 I do not see much sense in flat failure.
-#           The tests should rather simulate an error condition
-#           and then let act their error reporting facilities
-#           if they have some.
-# if [ x"$SIMULATE_FAILURE" != x"0" -a x"$SIMULATE_FAILURE" != x"1" ]; then
-#  print_help
-#  printf "\n${SELF}: -f  simulate failure.\n\n"
-#  exit 31
-# fi
+# <<< This cannot happen if $no_getopts = 1
+if [ x"$SIMULATE_FAILURE" != x"0" -a x"$SIMULATE_FAILURE" != x"1" ]; then
+ print_help
+ printf "\n${SELF}: -f  simulate failure.\n\n"
+ exit 31
+fi