Got rid of assert() in mmc.c by soft means
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
||||
/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: t; tab-width: 8; c-basic-offset: 8; -*- */
|
||||
|
||||
#include <assert.h>
|
||||
/* ts A61009 */
|
||||
/* #include <a ssert.h> */
|
||||
|
||||
#include <stdio.h>
|
||||
#include <string.h>
|
||||
#include <unistd.h>
|
||||
@ -18,6 +20,12 @@
|
||||
#include "structure.h"
|
||||
#include "options.h"
|
||||
|
||||
/* ts A61005 */
|
||||
#include "libdax_msgs.h"
|
||||
extern struct libdax_msgs *libdax_messenger;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned char MMC_GET_TOC[] = { 0x43, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0 };
|
||||
static unsigned char MMC_GET_ATIP[] = { 0x43, 2, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0 };
|
||||
static unsigned char MMC_GET_DISC_INFO[] =
|
||||
@ -99,19 +107,43 @@ int mmc_get_nwa(struct burn_drive *d)
|
||||
+ (data[14] << 8) + data[15];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mmc_close_disc(struct burn_drive *d, struct burn_write_opts *o)
|
||||
/* ts A61009 : function is obviously unused. */
|
||||
/* void mmc_close_disc(struct burn_drive *d, struct burn_write_opts *o) */
|
||||
void mmc_close_disc(struct burn_write_opts *o)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct burn_drive *d;
|
||||
|
||||
mmc_function_spy("mmc_close_disc");
|
||||
assert(o->drive == d);
|
||||
|
||||
libdax_msgs_submit(libdax_messenger, -1, 0x00000002,
|
||||
LIBDAX_MSGS_SEV_DEBUG, LIBDAX_MSGS_PRIO_ZERO,
|
||||
"HOW THAT ? mmc_close_disc() was called", 0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ts A61009 : made impossible by removing redundant parameter d */
|
||||
/* a ssert(o->drive == d); */
|
||||
d = o->drive;
|
||||
|
||||
o->multi = 0;
|
||||
spc_select_write_params(d, o);
|
||||
mmc_close(d, 1, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mmc_close_session(struct burn_drive *d, struct burn_write_opts *o)
|
||||
/* ts A61009 : function is obviously unused. */
|
||||
/* void mmc_close_session(struct burn_drive *d, struct burn_write_opts *o) */
|
||||
void mmc_close_session(struct burn_write_opts *o)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct burn_drive *d;
|
||||
|
||||
mmc_function_spy("mmc_close_session");
|
||||
assert(o->drive == d);
|
||||
|
||||
libdax_msgs_submit(libdax_messenger, -1, 0x00000002,
|
||||
LIBDAX_MSGS_SEV_DEBUG, LIBDAX_MSGS_PRIO_ZERO,
|
||||
"HOW THAT ? mmc_close_session() was called", 0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ts A61009 : made impossible by removing redundant parameter d */
|
||||
/* a ssert(o->drive == d); */
|
||||
d = o->drive;
|
||||
|
||||
o->multi = 3;
|
||||
spc_select_write_params(d, o);
|
||||
mmc_close(d, 1, 0);
|
||||
@ -121,7 +153,12 @@ void mmc_close(struct burn_drive *d, int session, int track)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct command c;
|
||||
|
||||
mmc_function_spy("mmc_close_session");
|
||||
mmc_function_spy("mmc_close");
|
||||
|
||||
libdax_msgs_submit(libdax_messenger, -1, 0x00000002,
|
||||
LIBDAX_MSGS_SEV_DEBUG, LIBDAX_MSGS_PRIO_ZERO,
|
||||
"HOW THAT ? mmc_close() was called", 0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
c.retry = 1;
|
||||
c.oplen = sizeof(MMC_CLOSE);
|
||||
memcpy(c.opcode, MMC_CLOSE, sizeof(MMC_CLOSE));
|
||||
@ -154,6 +191,7 @@ void mmc_get_event(struct burn_drive *d)
|
||||
c.page->data[5], c.page->data[6], c.page->data[7]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void mmc_write_12(struct burn_drive *d, int start, struct buffer *buf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct command c;
|
||||
@ -161,7 +199,10 @@ void mmc_write_12(struct burn_drive *d, int start, struct buffer *buf)
|
||||
|
||||
mmc_function_spy("mmc_write_12");
|
||||
len = buf->sectors;
|
||||
assert(buf->bytes >= buf->sectors); /* can be == at 0... */
|
||||
|
||||
/* ts A61009 */
|
||||
/* a ssert(buf->bytes >= buf->sectors);*/ /* can be == at 0... */
|
||||
|
||||
burn_print(100, "trying to write %d at %d\n", len, start);
|
||||
memcpy(c.opcode, MMC_WRITE_12, sizeof(MMC_WRITE_12));
|
||||
c.retry = 1;
|
||||
@ -195,7 +236,10 @@ int mmc_write(struct burn_drive *d, int start, struct buffer *buf)
|
||||
return BE_CANCELLED;
|
||||
|
||||
len = buf->sectors;
|
||||
assert(buf->bytes >= buf->sectors); /* can be == at 0... */
|
||||
|
||||
/* ts A61009 : buffer fill problems are to be handled by caller */
|
||||
/* a ssert(buf->bytes >= buf->sectors);*/ /* can be == at 0... */
|
||||
|
||||
burn_print(100, "trying to write %d at %d\n", len, start);
|
||||
memcpy(c.opcode, MMC_WRITE_10, sizeof(MMC_WRITE_10));
|
||||
c.retry = 1;
|
||||
@ -251,7 +295,8 @@ void mmc_read_toc(struct burn_drive *d)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
some drives fail this check.
|
||||
|
||||
assert(((dlen - 2) % 11) == 0);
|
||||
ts A61007 : if re-enabled then not via Assert.
|
||||
a ssert(((dlen - 2) % 11) == 0);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
d->toc_entry = malloc(d->toc_entries * sizeof(struct burn_toc_entry));
|
||||
tdata = c.page->data + 4;
|
||||
@ -382,9 +427,14 @@ void mmc_read_sectors(struct burn_drive *d,
|
||||
struct command c;
|
||||
|
||||
mmc_function_spy("mmc_read_sectors");
|
||||
assert(len >= 0);
|
||||
/* if the drive isn't busy, why the hell are we here? */
|
||||
assert(d->busy);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ts A61009 : to be ensured by callers */
|
||||
/* a ssert(len >= 0); */
|
||||
|
||||
/* if the drive isn't busy, why the hell are we here? */
|
||||
/* ts A61006 : i second that question */
|
||||
/* a ssert(d->busy); */
|
||||
|
||||
burn_print(12, "reading %d from %d\n", len, start);
|
||||
memcpy(c.opcode, MMC_READ_CD, sizeof(MMC_READ_CD));
|
||||
c.retry = 1;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user