Some "pro" arguments for the disputed items in releng/TODO

This commit is contained in:
Thomas Schmitt 2011-08-19 08:49:09 +00:00
parent a48495f399
commit f71981ac49
1 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -22,15 +22,23 @@
* ??? Still to decide: * ??? Still to decide:
Delete debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso with ./run_all_auto -c Delete debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso with ./run_all_auto -c
Currently remaining large files (like downloaded ISO images) are Contra: Currently remaining large files (like downloaded ISO images) are
simply left behind to be re-used and a boldified info message is shown simply left behind to be re-used and a boldified info message is shown
so the users can decide for themselves what to remove or leave as well. so the users can decide for themselves what to remove or leave as well.
Pro: Leaving 70 MB of image is quite obtrusive. Option -c is not run
under normal circumstances. So it could well be used for total cleanup.
Alternative: Specific option --remove_image.
* ??? Still to decide: * ??? Still to decide:
Have a script ./run_all_manual Have a script ./run_all_manual
Contra argument: if a releng sctipt is suitable to be run under amaster Contra argument: if a releng sctipt is suitable to be run under a master
script run_all*, then this releng script should be put into auto_* script run_all*, then this releng script should be put into auto_*
namespace , otherwise it is manual_*. namespace , otherwise it is manual_*.
Pro: Tests may be manual because they demand lots of resources, not
because they need manual attention. In general the run_all_manual script
shall spare the user the plight to read the documentation. Instead it
shall present the manual tests, give an opportunity to skip the test,
and ask for parameters,
* derive a GNU xorriso test suite from libisoburn test suite * derive a GNU xorriso test suite from libisoburn test suite